|
N. Korea demands nuke reactor from U.S.
(AP)
Updated: 2005-09-20 18:59
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Qin Gang was asked in Beijing whether
North Korea might have misunderstood the order of commitments laid out in the
statement Monday.
"The common statement was adopted by all six parties and I don't think North
Korea has any misunderstanding," Qin said.
Qin said that the November talks were still on, as far as he knew.
President Bush's administration has opposed anything resembling a 1994
U.S.-North Korea agreement, which promised the North two light-water reactors
for power. That project stalled amid the current crisis, which broke out in late
2002 after U.S. officials said the North admitted having a secret nuclear
program.
The North's latest position is likely to be a major sticking point in future
discussions.
"If the North meant it, it would pose a lot of problems for future talks,"
said Baek Seung-joo, senior researcher at the Korea Institute for Defense
Analysis in Seoul. "The United States will never be able to accept the North's
demand as it means going back to the 1994 agreement."
The agreement Monday had drawn praise around the world and raised hopes of
resolving a standoff that has raised concerns of an arms race in northeast Asia.
Under the pact, in exchange for abandoning its weapons, the North gets
security guarantees and energy aid, including a pledge from South Korea to
provide it with electricity.
The North said Tuesday it would "wait and see how the U.S. will move" and
warned there would "very serious and complicated" consequences if Washington
demands the dismantlement of the DPRK's nuclear programs before providing a
light-water reactor.
|
 | | | North Korea to drop nuclear weapons development | | |  | | | Clinton Global Initiative Summit | | |  | | | Schwarzenegger seeks re-election in 2006 | | |
|
| |
 |
|
|
|
|
Today's
Top News |
|
|
|
Top World
News |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
